Mental health recovery narratives increase meaning in life and quality of life:NEON-O Trial findings

Stefan RENNICK-EGGLESTONE1, Clare ROBINSON2, Rachel ELLIOTT3, Chris NEWBY1, Fiona NG1, Mike SLADE1

1University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
2Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
3University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Introduction: The Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) programme [https://www.researchintorecovery.com/research/neon/] investigated whether mental health recovery narratives are helpful for people affected by mental health problems.



Methods: We developed the NEON Intervention, a web-application providing access to a diverse collection of 659 recovery narratives [https://doi.org/10.2196/24417]. We evaluated the intervention in a parallel group online randomised trial recruiting adults in England experiencing non-psychosis mental health problems [NEON-O Trial, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN63197153]. Intervention arm participants received immediate access, control arm participants received 52-week delayed access, participants were not masked to treatment allocation, and outcome assessment was through web-based questionnaires. The primary objective was to evaluate effectiveness in improving quality of life (QoL) at 52-week follow-up, controlling for usual care. The primary analysis was a linear regression model of outcome. The economic analysis compared costs and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) gained between arms, from a healthcare provider perspective. Analyses were baseline-adjusted, using a modified Intention To Treat principle [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07246-8]. 



Results: 1,023 participants recruited from March 2020 to March 2021 (Intervention 507, control 516). 80.8% White British; 79.3% female; mean age 38.4±13.6 years. Mood disorders (61.2%) and stress-related disorders (14.9%) were the most common primary mental health problem. At week 52, we found a significant baseline-adjusted difference of 0.13 (95% CI: 0.01-0.26, p=0.041) in the Manchester Short Assessment score between arms, and a significant baseline-adjusted difference of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.05-0.40, p=0.014) in the Meaning in Life Questionnaire [presence subscale]. We found an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio of £12,526 per QALY, lower than a £20,000 threshold used by the NHS in England, indicating a cost-effective intervention.



Conclusion: We have provided first-in-field evidence that online mental health recovery narratives provide meaningful benefits to people experiencing non-psychosis mental health problems. The increased presence of meaning in life may protect against mental health distress. Future studies could examine alternative narrative delivery mechanisms.